chrisvenus: (Default)
[personal profile] chrisvenus
A friend drew my attention to http://www.operationorgasm.co.uk/ and I was horrified by the statistics and lauded what they were doing:

"A recent survey by Sextoys.co.uk revealed that a massive 12.9% of women have never experienced the pleasure of an orgasm, so we are making it our mission to open up the opportunity of orgasm to every woman in the UK!"

Well, sextoys.co.uk are doing there bit and I'm willing to do mine. So anybody in the UK who wishes to should feel free to contacat me and I'll do my bit to help that poor 12.9% and the other 87.1% too if they want. I'll even extend the offer to those outside the UK as long as they help with travel arrangements.

I'm just so considerate, you know.


P.S. This post may not be 100% serious.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 09:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uberredfraggle.livejournal.com
So you won't pay for my flight from Oz and make me come? damnit.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 10:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uberredfraggle.livejournal.com
Well I have the place to myself including jacuzzi. HEhehe

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 10:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scat0324.livejournal.com
What proportion of that 12.9% are really really offensively smelly/ugly/whatever?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 10:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
You know, you're not the first guy to make that offer. Interesting that so many men have a high enough opinion of themselves that they think they can help such women :)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 11:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Interesting that so many men have a high enough opinion of themselves that they think they can help such women

Equally interesting that they have such an optimistic outlook concerning people whose only known attribute is "female" that they imagine they'd want to!

My immediate mental image associated with the 12.9% was something approximately resembling Anne Widdecombe with a moustache.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 11:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
Wow. You know that's not a great reflection on *your* ideas about women, either...

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Did you miss the winky? Or am I being offensive in some way I don't entirely understand?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 11:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
Ah, I did miss the winky! I never look at the blue bit. I take it all back.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 11:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
I don't like LJ's plug and play styles for exactly this reason. It's one thing to have CSS-like separation between markup and implementation, but it causes big problems when some implementations might be randomly rubbish.

Another annoying example of this is [livejournal.com profile] leathellin's LJ. Her style has hyperlinks invisible until you mouse over them. Which means if you follow normal good practice and make your hyperlinked terms descriptive, people miss the links entirely. (eg. "Everyone loves a brave knight!")

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 12:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
Hm, her links *are* actualy a different colour from her text - but I agree, the contrast is practically zero. Naughty [livejournal.com profile] leathellin.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-04 10:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leathellin.livejournal.com
Shocking - dissing people's styles while they're on holiday :-)
Actually my links are quite a noticeably different colour when they aren't visited links (so I can quickly see if I have seen that one recently or not). Either that or I just have better colour vision than the rest of you :-p

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-05 10:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
The latter, I think, as I've never visited any of your links! To me your links look to be only a tiny bit lighter than your text. Perhaps you have a very high contrast monitor?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-05 10:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
Yep, I think it's the monitor - having just looked on my home monitor, which is highly coloured, the links are clearer than on my work monitor, which has a good colour profile.

This is the kind of thing that makes life so much fun for web designers: no design looks the same on any two screens.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-05 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
I get round this with a GreaseMonkey script that forces "&style=mine" to any journal page I visit. My own style is far from beautiful, but it's pretty clear.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 12:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dave [earth.li] (from livejournal.com)
> Interesting that so many men have a high enough opinion of themselves that they think > they can help such women

Even if they don't manage to help I suspect it'll be fun trying.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
Even if they don't manage to help I suspect it'll be fun trying.

For them.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 02:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
I can. It's easy to think that someone else has the answers to your problems.

But ok, I'll drop it, I know you meant it as a joke. I'm just not very comfortable with jokes about this kind of thing. For the people who have these problems it's not remotely funny. And for a guy to say (yes, I know, joke) that he can help is a little like saying that lesbians just haven't met the right man. Or, a more direct comparison, if a woman joked that she'd be happy to help 'cure' a bloke with impotence - presumably most guys don't find impotence especially funny? It just trivialises the very real problems that those people are having.

Oh, look, I utterly failed to drop it. Dropping it now.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 03:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
In an interesting crossover with the debate currently raging in [livejournal.com profile] secretrebel's lj, although I don't find the joke in question remotely funny, I *do* find the *idea* of it appealing, when utterly divorced from reality. See, sex, not remotely rational.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-03 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
You seem to be clear on the difference, but I've met men who genuinely believed they *could* solve any such problems a woman had. They're creepy.

I guess I tend to feel that joking about such things perpetuates such ideas. There are a lot of sexist ( /racist / insert prejudice of choice) jokes made under the defense that its 'just' a joke, but sometimes that's the most insidious form of such ideas.

Profile

chrisvenus: (Default)
chrisvenus

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags