I'm sure I've said this before...

[chrisvenus]

New year's eve I'm sure I was talking to somebody about lesbians. They were saying that watching lesbians was pointless because there was no possibility of joining in. This reminded me of one of my favourite strips from a webcomic called one over zero.

http://www.undefined.net/1/0/?strip=410

Yes, I have been spending my day very unproductively so far. :)

Comments

[bateleur.livejournal.com]

because there was no possibility of joining in

Although possibly the person you were talking to is being unduly charitable there. How often does someone viewing pr0n get to participate ? Hmm ?

I have no idea, but I'm guessing "never" is a fair approximation ! So lesbians are clearly a great idea, because you don't get some pointless ugly bloke ruining a perfectly good pr0n movie/pic.

[(Anonymous)]

The prettiness is covered (they just look better without the ugly bloks hanging round the place), but also there is the warm happy glow from watching not just one, but two women enjoying themselves, without that nasty jelousy you get from watching a bloke enjoying himself.

[http://users.livejournal.com/_corpse_/]

I'm inclined to agree with bateleur. My understanding of the attraction of chick-on-chick pr0n is that there's no danger of finding a stray limb attractive only to discover that it belonged to a fella; instantly rendering one gay.

[(Anonymous)]

In the words of Jeff from coupling:

"Lesbians are porn efficient. It's sex with a greater density of women."

"...Porn wise, lesbians are like a jam sandwich without the sandwich and just the jam. In fact, lesbians are just a big blob of jam. Well, not actually. Unless they've exploded in all the lesbonic excitement. Also, in bloke driven porn you run the risk of potential dangerous eye slippage."