Polar bears win again!
Sep. 10th, 2003 01:53 pmIn a not so recent news story it appears that a polar bear and a nuclear submarine, one of the biggest in the world, had a fight. The polar bear did, of course, win.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world/WorldNewsTonight/polarbear030530.html
or
http://newpaper.asia1.com.sg/top/story/0,4136,26603-1054569540,00.html
The judgement of vicotry had to be based on points since both participants were able to walk away at the end of the fight but the polar bear had damaged its opponent while remaining entirely healthy, and, according to some reports was looking for dinner during this fight. No seals appeared but the rudder of the submarine provided a reasonable snack.
Hmmm... need a polar bear picture for my LJ icons, I think... And therefore a paid account so I can have more userpics. :)
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world/WorldNewsTonight/polarbear030530.html
or
http://newpaper.asia1.com.sg/top/story/0,4136,26603-1054569540,00.html
The judgement of vicotry had to be based on points since both participants were able to walk away at the end of the fight but the polar bear had damaged its opponent while remaining entirely healthy, and, according to some reports was looking for dinner during this fight. No seals appeared but the rudder of the submarine provided a reasonable snack.
Hmmm... need a polar bear picture for my LJ icons, I think... And therefore a paid account so I can have more userpics. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-10 06:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-10 08:07 am (UTC)I was also amused to note that a US military website reported that there was no damage to the submarine. Sounds like a cover up to me... Maybe the submarine really *did* sink to the bottom of the waves. AFter all, if the US military are claiming "Submarine 1 Polar bear 0" then what else are they lying about?