Spaced out
Mar. 6th, 2008 10:17 amI'm feeling very strange today for many reasons, not least of all the serious lack of sleep that I got last night. My odd mood has me wanting to go out and do something but of course I am in work so I can't. So instead I am posting to LJ. Its not quite the same thing but breaks up the day a little bit at least.
So what's everybody else up to? talk to me, tell me things, post interesting comments and say interesting stuff. Or uninteresting stuff. I just think people should post things.
For my part I discovered that a leg holstser that I have for roleplaying purposes can be attached to the frame of my bed relatively easily. It was one of those random moments as I saw it lying in the corner and deccided to just see if I could. I should probably take it off again before people worry...
So there's my random comment. Now to go play with stylesheets for work...
So what's everybody else up to? talk to me, tell me things, post interesting comments and say interesting stuff. Or uninteresting stuff. I just think people should post things.
For my part I discovered that a leg holstser that I have for roleplaying purposes can be attached to the frame of my bed relatively easily. It was one of those random moments as I saw it lying in the corner and deccided to just see if I could. I should probably take it off again before people worry...
So there's my random comment. Now to go play with stylesheets for work...
It's supposed to be interesting ... I do not agree.
Date: 2008-03-06 10:41 am (UTC)- May promote inflexibility
- Unrealistic standards may hamper emplyee motivation
- Setting performance standard is time consuming
- Factors beyond employee's control may affect outcomes
- Fact not rewarded may be overlooked
You wanted a comment.
Enjoy the current slide of my HR class.
:p
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 10:44 am (UTC)You really want to know? Well, OK. I've been wondering why nothing bounces.
If you look at a 2D physics system - of which there are numerous examples on the web now - it looks quite impressive until you realise that nothing's bouncing at all. Every time two things collide they instantly lose all their (relative) KE.
This would just be an implementation detail, but various different implementations all seem to do it. So now I've spent my morning pondering the reason. (What a rock and roll life I lead, eh?)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 10:45 am (UTC)Should be done by tonight.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:05 am (UTC)Sidenote: I can remember asking in my A level maths class what determined the value, because, for example, a marble dropped onto a trampoline doesn't bounce (mostly), but dropped onto a tiled floor, it does. Conversely, a person dropped onto those two surfaces does bounce in the first case, but tends to splat in the second. My teacher (in essence) asked me to go away and stop worrying about it ;-)
On the other hand, setting a global coefficient of (eg) 0.25 wouldn't be too bad.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:30 am (UTC)Re: It's supposed to be interesting ... I do not agree.
Date: 2008-03-06 11:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:38 am (UTC)I want to hide in a corner and recover from Albion. They won't let me. Bastards.
Got plans for a Broken World character yet?
Oh, and doesn't the phrase This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting sound so clunky? Surely just Your IP address will logged when posting would be much neater and convey just as much meaning? It bugs me.
I need a top hat.
So, Exalted again week after next?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:39 am (UTC)Indeed. I can see the argument for a flat value, but why zero? (My tentative answer so far is that is has to do with complications arising from the nature of impacts in quantized time.)
Also unless your software needs to support a very large number of different materials there's nothing wrong with having a lookup table for coefficients of restitution. Takes a pair of materials, returns a hardcoded result.
(Incidentally I think trampoline is a bogus example - that would need to be modelled as a complex structure, not a rigid body.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:46 am (UTC)My current theory is that quantized time causes the problem. Why? Because forces are replaced with impulses, but applying gravity as an impulse is problematic in any frame in which a collision occurs. This is because you end up processing each impact at slightly the wrong velocity (since it occurs mid-frame in general but the gravity-adjusted velocity is as at end-of-frame). This sounds like a small effect, but it means objects won't come properly to rest. Instead they'll bobble around as though there's an earthquake going on.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:48 am (UTC)And I guess the IP logging thing is to make it clear that it is a user option and that the user has access to it rather than that the LJ team log it and only they have access. After all, I suspect even with the option off LJ probably do still log the IP address...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:50 am (UTC)My thoughts on deflections were that in a way they *should* be a similar principle to bouncing on a floor. However, I can see that approximations could be modelled differently for each of them.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 12:03 pm (UTC)Sucks to be me.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 12:19 pm (UTC)Re: Exalted. I am here next week, but not the two weeks after that. And then back again.
TO THE FUTURE.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 12:21 pm (UTC)I shall send an e-mail out at some point. Not really thought too much about it yet.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 12:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 12:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 12:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 12:31 pm (UTC)Hurrah! Actual innovation!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 12:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 12:52 pm (UTC)This is kind of cool, though, considering I woke up this morning in Basel!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 12:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 01:06 pm (UTC)I was on the 7am (CET) flight.
This means I got a taxi at 5.45am (CET). Which is like, 4.45am UK time.
I'm going to be so dead tonight! :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 06:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 09:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-06 11:32 pm (UTC)Done now though.