chrisvenus: (Default)
[personal profile] chrisvenus
I have found a bug or possibly a "feature" in IE that is causing problems. I suspect there may be some crappy IE setting somewhere causing it but I don't know what it is.

If I go to http://the.earth.li/~chris/IETest/test.html you can see three polar bears. In Firefox they are at the correct size. In IE they are shown 25% larger than they should be. This causes problems on some images which lose definition in this crude resizing.

The three images on the page are because I tried to set explicit sizes on the images. IE ignores them. Or more precisely adds 25% to them so I can get it to work for IE by explciitly telling it to be smaller.

Can people confirm whether they see this (easiest to tell by having IE and firefox open next to each other) and possibly even tell me why it is doing it? If it isn't doing it for you I'd be interested to know what your viewing with. I'm reasonably sure that it is an IE only thing and that its probably some accessiblity option or something crap like that that was turned on by default on this laptop. I'm stumped though and my google-fu has failed me.

Thanks for the help, guys (and dolls).

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-15 12:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leathellin.livejournal.com
Well I don't see it but i'm not sure that helps narrow it down any..

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-15 01:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hsenag.livejournal.com
Same size in IE and Firefox here.

IE 6.0.2900.2180.xpsp2.050301-1526 (possibly typoed cos I can't cut and paste from the about box, silly IE)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-15 01:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
I see three identical bears in each browser.

Possibly you've done that annoying mouse-wheel-zoom thing by mistake ? (It's something like CTRL-wheel or ALT-wheel but I can't test it right now since I'm on my laptop.)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-15 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kissifa.livejournal.com
They don't look oversized in my IE I'm afraid, but don't have Firefox to compare.

In other news, eeeee! My polar bear! *squee* :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-15 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leathellin.livejournal.com
Except that mine would also count as a default Dell install. Hmm.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-15 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] natchdan.livejournal.com
Same sizes for me, chap.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-16 08:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sea-of-flame.livejournal.com
Could it be that someone's twiddled the display options to force images larger?

I've no idea whether that's possible - I know there is a 'visibility' option or something which is intended for the partially sighted, to increase the size of text forcibly at the browser end to make it easier to read....maybe with the modern tendency to use image files for headings instead of just fonts, someone's included an option to do it with image files as well?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-16 10:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jojomojo.livejournal.com
There is the DPI setting under Control Panel->Display->Settings->Advanced->General, and fonts under Display->Appearance.

And also Display->Appearance->Advanced->Use large icons might be relevant?

Not sure if that'll help you any or not...

Profile

chrisvenus: (Default)
chrisvenus

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags